[1]
76w
The men were asked whether a doctor had ever told them that they had had angina or a myocardial infarc- tion (heart attack, coronary thrombosis), a stroke, or several other disorders. The World Health Organisation (Rose) chest pain questionnaire for angina or possible myocardial infarction was administered to all men at the initial examination,9 and a three-orthogonal lead electrocardiogram was recorded at rest and analysed by computer in the department of medical cardiology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary.
[2]
119w
The men were separated into three groups according to the degree of evidence of ischaemic heart disease present at screening. (1) No evidence of ischaemic heart disease on WHO (Rose) chest pain questionnaire or electrocardiogram and no recall of a doctor diagnosing ischaemic heart disease (n= 5767). (2) Asymptomatic ischaemic heart disease: those with electrocardiographic evidence of definite or possible myocardial ischaemia or myocardial infarction and who did not report any chest pain on WHO questionnaire or have recall of a doctor diagnosing ischaemic heart disease (n=777). (3) Symptomatic ischaemic heart disease: those with angina or a possible myo- cardial infarction on WHO chest pain questionnaire or who remembered a doctor diagnosing angina or heart attack (n = 1165).
[3]
27w
In some of the analyses those with recall of stroke (n=40) have also been included in the symptomatic group (see figure). In the subsequent analyses men in
[4]
96w
o o Symptomatic DICoAsymptomatic * * None Stroke 9 18 11 Heart attacks 22 40 79 \45 22 22 14 9 23 38 84 8 19 32 27 a) W. a) E O O C-%w 0 --(D5 & 0 Heart attacks plus stroke 22 93 46 12 25 29 46 14 10 132 97 -2 O 42 34 a) -a >.BBn c a) L 0 0) ' i: 2 2 O m Symptomatic n= 180 406 270 150 117 42 Asymptomatic n= 67 240 184 123 114 43 None n= 439 1699 1307 932 889 428
[5]
32w
Adjusted relative risk of stroke and heart attack separately and both events combined in men with symptomatic ischaemic heart disymptomatymptomatic ischaemic heart disease, and no evidence ofheart disease according to physical activity.
[6]
37w
Relative risk is adjustedfor age, social class, smoking, body mass index, and heavy drinking. Numbers ofevents are indicated on the figure groups 2 and 3 were regarded as having pre-existing ischaemic heart disease or stroke. PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
[7]
156w
At screening the men were asked to indicate their usual pattern of physical activity under the headings of regular walking or cycling, recreational activity, and sporting (vigorous) activity. Regular walking and cycling related to weekday journeys, which included those to and from work. Recreational activity included gardening, walking for pleasure, and do it yourself jobs. Sporting activity included running, golf, swimming, tennis, sailing, and digging. A physical activity (exercise) score was derived for each man based on frequency and type (intensity) of the physical activity. Scores were assigned for each type of activity and duration based on the intensity and energy demands of the activities reported. This was based on the recom- mendations of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop'" and the Minnesota intensity codes." Full details of the derivation of the score have been described.2 The total score is a measure of how much physical activity has been carried out or energy expended.
[8]
166w
The men were grouped into six broad categories based on their total score. The categories were inactive (score 0-2; n=686); occasional activity (score 3-5; n=2345)-regular walking or recreational activity only; light activity (score 6-8; n= 1761)-more frequent recreational activities or sporting exercise less than once a week; moderate activity (score 9-12; n= 1205) -cycling or very frequent recreational activities or sporting activity once a week; moderately vigorous activity (score 13-20; n=1120)-sporting activity at least once a week or frequent cycling plus frequent recreational activities or walking or frequent sporting activity only; vigorous activity (score 5e21; n=513)-very frequent sporting exercise or frequent sporting exercise plus other recreational activities. The physical activity score has been validated by using heart rate and lung function in men with no evidence of ischaemic heart disease.2 FOLLOW UP All men, whether or not they had evidence of ischaemic heart disease or stroke at initial examination, were followed up for mortality from all causes and morbidity from cardiovascular causes for 9 5 years."
[9]
129w
Information on death was collected through the estab- lished "tagging" procedures provided by the NHS registers in Southport (England and Wales) and Edin- burgh (Scotland). Non-fatal strokes were those which produced a neurological deficit that was present for more than 24 hours. Fatal episodes were those coded on the death certificate as ICD (ninth revision) 430-438. A non-fatal myocardial infarction was diagnosed according to WHO criteria." Fatal events were defined as deaths in which ischaemic heart disease (ICD 410-414) was the underlying cause. The ascer- tainment of non-fatal events (heart attack, stroke) was based on continuous reporting by general practitioners, reinforced by a regular series of reviews of all patient records at one and a half, three, five, six and a half, eight, and nine and a half years.
[10]
45w
Table I shows the age adjusted rates/1000 men/year for stroke in all men. Relative risks adjusted for age are also shown. There was a strong inverse association between physical activity and risk of stroke even after adjusting for age (p<0-0001). In a recent report from
[11]
100w
TABLE I-Age adjusted rates ofstroke according to physical activity Men with no Men with All men ischaemic heart disease or stroke ischaemic heart disease or stroke Rate/1000/ year (relative Rate/1000/ Rate/1000/ Physical activity No of men No of strokes risk) No of men No of strokes year No of men No of strokes year Inactive 686 21 3-1 (1 0) 439 9 2-2 247 12 4-7 Occasional 2345 52 2-3 (0 7) 1699 26 1-6 646 26 4-2 Light 1761 29 1-7(0-5) 1307 15 1-2 454 14 3-3 Moderate 1205 15 1 4(0 4) 932 10 1-2 273 5 2-1
[12]
42w
889 7 0 9 231 2 1-2 Vigorous 513 2 0-5 (0 2) 428 1 0 3 85 1 1-4 BMJ VOLUME 304 7 MARCH 1992 32-2 5 - 2-1 5 - .Z a) .) a) ._ :D 11-)I5 - O -
[13]
179w
the British regional heart study, physical activity was shown to be strongly (inversely) associated with social class, smoking, heavy drinking, body weight, and blood pressure,2 factors known to be associated with the risk of stroke. Since blood pressure may be a mediating factor we examined the relation between physical activity and stroke adjusting first for age, social class, smoking, heavy drinking, and body mass index (table II). Even after adjustment for these factors there was a significant inverse association between physical activity and risk of stroke (p= 0 001). Further adjustment for systolic blood pressure reduced the trend only slightly, and the association remained significant (p=0O003). Moderate and moderately vigorous levels of activity were associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of stroke, and the benefit from vigorous activity was even greater. Since the presence and severity of ischaemic heart disease is strongly associated with physical activity, we also adjusted for prevalence of pre-existing ischaemic heart disease or stroke. This further adjustment made little difference to the strong association seen and the trend remained significant (p=0008) (table II).
[14]
173w
Table I shows the age adjusted rates for men with and without evidence of ischaemic heart disease or stroke. There was a significant inverse relation between physical activity and stroke in men with and without evidence of ischaemic heart disease or stroke (p=0-01 and p=0 007 respectively). Table II shows the relative risk of stroke in these two groups adjusted for age, social class, smoking, heavy drinking, and body mass index and then in addition for systolic blood pressure. After the initial adjustment the relation was similar in the two groups, although the trend was more consistent in those with ischaemic heart disease or stroke. The most vigorously active men in both groups showed more than a 60% reduction in risk of stroke. Moderate levels of physical activity were associated with a 40% reduction in those without evidence of ischaemic heart disease and a 50% reduction in those with evidence. A test for trend gave significant results in those with ischaemic heart disease or stroke (b= -0-26, p=0 02) and marginally significant results
[15]
50w
TABLE II-Relative risk (95% confidence interval) ofstroke in all men and in men with and without evidence ofischaemic heart disease Men with no evidence of Men with evidence of All men ischaemic heart disease ischaemic heart disease (n=7630 (128 strokes)) (n= 5694 (68 strokes)) (n= 1936 (60 strokes)) Physical activity
[16]
10w
Test for trend p=0-001 p=0-003 p=0-008 p=0-06 p=0-I p=0-02 p=0-04
[17]
12w
A=Adjusted for age, social class, smoking, heavy drinking, and body mass index.
[18]
10w
B=Adjusted for the factors in A plus systolic blood pressure.
[19]
16w
C=Adjusted for the factors in A and B plus prevalence of ischaemic heart disease or stroke.
[20]
94w
TABLE III-Relative risk of stroke adjusted for age, social class, smoking, body mass index, and heavy drinking and excluding men reporting sporting activity at least once a month Men with no ischaemic Men with ischaemic heart disease or stroke heart disease or stroke Relative Relative Physical activity No of men No of strokes risk No of men No of strokes risk Inactive 439 9 1-0 247 12 1-0 Occasional 1678 26 0-82 640 26 0-90 Light 1210 15 0-63 434 14 0-75 Moderate 587 5 0-47 189 5 0-67 Moderately vigorous 92 1 0-53
[21]
51w
in those without ischaemic heart disease or stroke (b= -0 17, p=0 06), where b is the logistic regression coefficient fitting the six physical activity index groups continuously (that is, magnitude of the trend). Further adjustment for systolic blood pressure reduced the trend slightly (b= -0 25 and b= -0-16, respectively).
[22]
159w
We recently showed that sporting (vigorous) activity, although beneficial, was not essential to reduce the risk of heart attack.2 We therefore examined the relation with stroke separately in men with and without ischaemic heart disease or stroke, excluding men reporting sporting activities at least once a month (n=2091). After this exclusion, the number of men with pre-existing disease in the moderately vigorous and vigorous groups was very small (n=25) and these men have not been included in table III. A clear inverse trend in those with no evidence of ischaemic heart disease or stroke was evident even after adjustment for age, social class, body weight, and heavy drinking. However, this trend was not significant at the 5% level, presumably because of small numbers (b=-0-23, p = 0 15). In men with ischaemic heart disease or stroke the inverse trend was present but less clear (b= -0v 16, p=0 30) than it was before exclusion of men reporting sporting activities.
[23]
169w
Although our findings indicate a clear benefit for risk of stroke from increasing levels of physical activity in men with and without ischaemic heart disease or stroke, we recently showed that the relation between physical activity and the risk of heart attack differs in men with and without ischaemic heart disease. 2 The figure shows the relation between physical activity and heart attack, stroke, and both events combined in order to assess the overall benefit of physical activity for risk of a stroke or heart attack. Data for 9 5 years' follow up in all men are presented adjusted for age, social class, smoking, body mass index, and heavy drinking. Because of the small number of men with asymptomatic and symptomatic ischaemic heart disease in the vigorous activity group (n=43 and n=42 respectively) these men, seven of whom had a heart attack, have been omitted from the analysis. As there were only 19 cases of stroke in men with asymptomatic ischaemic heart disease these data have not been presented.
[24]
165w
Heart attack -In men without pre-existing ischaemic heart attack or stroke, the risk of heart attacks decreased significantly with increasing activity up to moderate and moderately vigorous levels (p<0-001) but then increased for vigorous activity. The increased risk in the vigorously active group compared with the moderate and moderately vigorous groups (relative risk= 1-6; 95% confidence interval 0-96 to 2 8) was marginally significant (p=007). Compared with inactive men, men doing moderate and moderately vigorous activity had about a 60% reduction in risk (0 42; 0 3 to 0 7 for moderate activity and 0 44; 0 3 to 0 7 for moderately vigorous activity). In men with symptomatic ischaemic heart disease or stroke, the risk decreased progressively, but not sig- nificantly, up to levels of moderate activity, but men engaged in moderately vigorous activity had an increased risk compared with moderately active men (1 6; 0 8 to 3 3 (p=0 1)). No clear pattern was seen in men with asymptomatic ischaemic heart disease.
[25]
24w
Stroke-A progressive lowering of risk was seen with increasing levels of physical activity in men with and without pre-existing ischaemic heart disease or stroke.
[26]
173w
Heart attack or stroke-When the overall risk of experiencing either a heart attack or a stroke was examined (figure) in men with no evidence of ischaemic heart disease or stroke, risk decreased significantly with increasing activity up to moderate and moderately vigorous levels (p<0-001) and there- after showed a slight but non-significant increase. Men with moderate and moderately vigorous activity had over a 50% reduction in overall risk of a cardiovascular event compared with inactive men (0 44; 0 3 to 0foot_0 for moderate activity and 0 45; 0 3 to 0 7 for moderately vigorous activity). In men with asymptomatic ischaemic heart disease physical inactivity was asso- ciated with the highest risk but thereafter there was little difference in risk between physical activity groups. In men with symptomatic ischaemic heart disease or stroke the lowest risk of an event was seen in the moderate activity group. Compared with moderately active men those engaged in moderately vigorous activity had an increased risk of an event (1 3; 0 4 to 2-6 (p=0 15)).
[27]
133w
In a study of former Harvard students (all male) participation in college sports was associated with a 60% reduction in risk of fatal stroke 10-50 years (average 30 years) later.' No adjustments were made for other risk factors and continued physical activity was not accounted for. In a later study of these students5 men free of diagnosed coronary heart disease at age 35-74 years reported their regular physical activity and were then followed for an average of 14 years. A strong inverse association was found between reported exercise levels and death from stroke and coronary heart disease. The exercise benefit was twice as strong for stroke as for coronary heart disease. It was independent of other risk factors, and sporting partici- pation in student days carried little or no benefit in later years.
[28]
230w
In the Framingham study analysis based on a 14 year follow up showed an inverse relation between physical activity and risk of stroke, but the trend was not significant after adjustment for age. 14 The classification of physical activity was very broad and included leisure time and occupational activity. Annual assessment of job activity in 3886 San Francisco longshoremen for 22 years showed that those with lower energy expenditure had a 62% increase in risk of stroke compared with those with higher energy expenditure after adjusting for age, smoking, and blood pressure, but the differ- ence was not significant. In a Dutch case-control study of survivors of stroke aged 40-74 admitted to hospital and hospital based controls, subjects were categorised according to their leisure time physical activity during the greatest portion of life as little, light, or heavy. Those engaged in heavy levels of physical activity showed a significant 60% reduction in risk of stroke compared with people engaged in little physical activity.6 Other risk factors were not adjusted for. In a random sample of men and women aged 30-59 years from two counties in eastern Finland, men and women with low physical activity at work had, respectively, a 60% and 70% increase in risk of stroke compared with those with high activity after adjusting for cardio- vascular risk factors.7 Leisure time activity was not related to risk of stroke.
[29]
29w
The size of the reduction in risk of stroke associated with physical activity seen in these studies is similar to that in our study when all men were included.
[30]
60w
We have previously shown that regular sporting (vigorous) activity, though beneficial in its own right, is not essential to produce a beneficial effect on heart attacks.2 This also seemed to be true for stroke, and an inverse association was still seen in men both with and without pre-existing ischaemic heart disease or stroke after excluding those reporting regular sporting activity.
[31]
190w
We observed that compared with moderate activity vigorous physical activity in men with no evidence of ischaemic heart disease or stroke and moderately vigorous activity in those with symptomatic ischaemic heart disease or stroke were associated with an increased risk of heart attacks. We could not determine whether the reduction in the number of strokes at high levels of physical activity was a direct effect of physical activity or whether it was due to competing causes. If men who are vigorously active have higher rates of heart attack, and have attacks at a younger age than is seen for stroke, then there will be fewer susceptible men at risk of stroke. However, the consistent dose response relation for stroke in men with and without ischaemic heart disease or stroke suggests that the reduction in risk of stroke is directly associated with physical activity. In men with no evidence of ischaemic heart disease or stroke, since moderate and moderately vigorous levels of activity were associated with the lowest rates of stroke and heart attacks the lower rates of stroke seen in these men are unlikely to be due to competing causes.
[32]
165w
Since heart attacks are over four times more common than strokes the benefits of reduction in stroke at vigorous levels of physical activity must be considered in the light of the overall risk of having either a heart attack or a stroke. In all men, irrespective of the nature of pre-existing ischaemic heart disease or stroke, physical inactivity was associated with the highest risk of having a stroke or heart attack, with risk falling with increasing activity up to moderate or moderately vigorous levels (figure). In men with no ischaemic heart disease or stroke, moderate and moderately vigorous levels of physical activity were associated with over a 50% reduction. Above this level risk increased slightly, but was still lower than that for inactivity, occasional activity, and even light activity because of the marked reduction in stroke attacks. In men with symptomatic ischaemic heart disease or stroke overall benefit was not apparent in those under- taking moderately vigorous activity despite the over- whelming reduction in stroke.
[33]
300w
The high risk of heart attacks in the inactive men with symptomatic ischaemic heart disease or stroke may partly be attributed to the fact that these men have more severe symptoms and are therefore unable to undertake physical activity. Several prospective studies have examined the relation between physical activity and overall mortality from cardiovascular causes and have found a progressive decrease in risk of death from cardiovascular disease with increasing physical activity. However, the highest category of physical activity in these studies tends to be fairly broad in definition and vigorously active subjects have not always been clearly separated.'4" In addition, men with clinical evidence of ischaemic heart disease have been excluded-that is, the men in whom vigorous levels of activity seemed to have the most adverse effects. Slattery et al found that those who did intense (sporting) activity did not show any more benefit in overall mortality from cardiovascular causes than those who did frequent light or moderate activities but no intense activity.15 CONCLUSIONS Moderate levels of physical activity, such as frequent regular walking plus recreational activity or sporting activity once a week, seem to be sufficient to produce a significant beneficial effect on cardiovascular risk in men both with and without evidence of ischaemic heart disease or stroke. More vigorous activity does not seem to confer any further protection and frequent sporting (vigorous) activity may be associated with an increased risk of heart attack, especially in those with symptomatic evidence of ischaemic heart disease or stroke. Such men who are contemplating or involved in regular vigorous activity should discuss their programme with an appropriate doctor. It seems reasonable, however, to recommend widespread and unrestricted participation in moderate levels of physical activity. Moderate activity is readily attain- able by large sections of the population and requires no special facilities.
[34]
57w
This study was supported by The Chest, Heart, and Stroke Association. The British Regional Heart Study is a British Heart Foundation research group and is also supported by the Department of Health and the Institute for Alcohol Studies. We thank Dr Ivan Perry, Dr Peter Whincup, and Mrs Mary Walker for their comments in preparing this paper.